growing shift to the right, which threatens to push into obscurity some parties that have dominated post-World War II politics.
Werner Faymann cited lack ofbacking from his fellow Social Democrats as his reason for stepping
down both as the nation's and his party's leader. "This country needs a chancellor who has the
party's full support," he said in a statement.
Vice Chancellor Reinhold Mitterlehner, of coalition partner People's Party, was to take over until
the government nominates a new candidate for presidential approval.
Pressure had been mounting on Faymann since his party's candidate was drubbed in the first round
of presidential elections last month by a rival from the right-wing Euroskeptic Freedom Party.
But his resignation was unexpected, signaling not only disarray within the Social Democratic Party
but also a shift in Austria's traditional political landscape.
In his more than seven years at the helm, the Social Democrats — who once commanded absolute
majorities have seen their popularity sink both in the 2013 natlonal elections and in provincial
votes.
The centnst People's Party — the Other dominant post-World War II political force — saw a
similar loss of support even before the migrant crisis hit full-force last year. In both cases, much of
the backing the traditional parties has shifted to the right-wing Freedom party.
The Freedom Party's strongest card is strong anti-migrant sentiment within Austria. But it also has
benefited from perceptions that the establishment parties are out of touch over Other issues,
including unemployment and terrorism.
Recent polls show support for the Freedom Party has surged to 32 percent, compared with just
over 20 percent for the government coalition. Even before the migrant influx strengthened the
right-wing opposition, decades of established party bickering over key issues — most recently tax,
pension and education reform — has fed perceptions of political stagnation.
Reflecting Austria's political upheaval, Freedom Party candidate Norbert Hofer received 35
percent of the vote in the April 24 first round presidential vote to just over I O percent each for the
Social Democratic and People's Party hopefuls. Hofer is the favorite going into the May 22 runoff
against a former leader of the Green party running as an independent.
The shift in favor ofa vehemently Euroskeptic party is significant, as Austria has been traditionally in the pro-EU camp. For pro-European politicians, it's a worrying sign of what could
happen in the country's next general election, which must be held within two years, and the latest
indication of the strength of anti-EU parties in Europe.
In EU founding member France, Marine Le Pen's far-right National Front party won European
Parliament elections two years ago, and a recent poll had 80 percent ofrespondents saying they
think she'll make it to the second round of France's 2017 presidential election. In the Netherlands,
a poll this year had anti-EU populist Geert Wilders' party leading in popularity.
Hungary and poland are already governed by Euroskeptic parties, while the Czech president
regularly criticizes the EU. In Scandinavia and Finland, populist parties advocating national
interests over EU authority are either in power or strongly represented in parliament.
Germany's anti-EU AfD party, is in eight state parliaments, scoring in the double digits last month
in three state parliament electlons.
Political scientist Thomas Filzmaier says the populist surge has paralleled growing disenchantment
with the European Union and traces both back to the 2008 world financial crisis.
Since then, he says, "trust in EU institutions has crumbled, but trust in national governments is
hardly better."
Faymann had hoped to stop the Freedom Party surge by swinging to end Austria's open-border
policies for refugees earlier this year. But that only hurt him and his party. While many Social
Democrats backed the move, others accused him ofbetraying their party's humanitarian principles.
Whistling and boos met him at his party's traditional May I event, drowning out the cheers Ofhis
backers. Many in the more than 10,000-strong crowd carried signs demanding he step down.
Faymann appeared unbowed, telling Austrians just last week to "continue reckoning with me." The
abrupt change of mind appeared to reflect an acknowledgment that change at the top is needed.
"This government needs a new start," he said Monday.
Response:
Austria's chancellor has made a bold decision and resigned from his position. As stated in the article, this is due to the shift to the right in Europe. There have been many political changes in Europe through the past few years, as in most countries, that have affected their major leaders. As Europe continues to rescue asylum seekers, or fight against IS, there is a constant shift in issues and power. At this point, the people of Europe (including Austria) are tired of being "saviors" of the asylum seekers. Werner Faymann desires Austria to restart and complete the foundation. With these consistent issues, Europe needs to change some critical aspects within their views and actions. I think it was very bold and probably uplifting in a sense as Faymann desires the government to have a "new start".
Jahn,
George. "Austria's Chancellor Resigns, in Europe's Shift to the
Right."
Washington Post. The Washington Post, 9 May 2016. Web. 10 May 2016.
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/austrian-chancellor-faymann-resigns-citing-lack-of-support/2016/05/09/8b59b0ac-15d9-11e6-971a-dadf9ab18869_story.html>.
